28 March 2012
Support our work: become a Friend of Statewatch from as little as £1/€1 per month.
Five Belgian
police officers sent to trial over death of Semira Adamu
Associated Press reports (26 March) that three face charges
of assault and battery and involuntary manslaughter for allegedly
pushing Adamu's head into an airline pillow just before the plane
was to take off from the Brussels airport. Also sent to trial
were two officers supervising the repatriation, who watched as
Adamu was forcibly placed on board and strapped into a seat.
The Brussels court ordered the two to face criminal negligence
charges saying they let the use of violence to restrain the illegal
immigrant go on far too long and should have stopped it.
Statewatch reported in 1998 on her death as follows:
"Chronicle of a Death Foretold": The causes and consequences of the death of Semira Adamu.
Statewatch bulletin, vol 8 no 5 (September-October 1998)
The death of Semira Adamu, a 20 year old Nigerian woman killed
whilst being deported from Belgium, has made headline news throughout
Europe, especially following the resignation of Home Affairs
minister Louis Tobback. Inquiries have since revealed that Semira's
death occurred as a consequence of practices which have become
part of a daily routine of deportations from Belgium.
The countdown to Semira's death began over two years ago with
the introduction in 1996 of a new asylum bill (see Statewatch,
vol 6, no. 2, 3, 4 & 5). This new legislation (known as Vande
Lanotte's law after then home office minister Johan Vande Lanotte)
increased the responsibility of transport companies, making them
liable for fines plus the costs of any sans-papiers brought into
Belgium by them. It also allowed the indefinite incarceration
of asylum seekers as well as the implementation of both the Schengen
and Dublin conventions regarding safe third
countries.
The implementation of the new law led to the creation of several
new asylum centres including the infamous "127bis"
in Steenokkerzeel close to Zaventem airport. Although the Belgian
government has since described the regime at Steenokkerzeel as
"relaxed", campaigners at the time described the asylum
centre as a "concentration camp" surrounded by two
fences topped by razor wire. At that time one of the distinctive
features of Steenokkerzeel was the arbitrary use of isolation
cells to hold "unruly" asylum seekers for an indefinite
period.
The new law also saw the introduction of quotas, (9,000 in 1996,
12,000 in 1997, 15,000 in 1998). In order to meet these quotas
new practices were introduced to speed up deportations, such
as the removal of the children of deportees straight from school.
In October 1997, after resistance from deportees had led to the
cancellation of deportations, a new Rijkswacht (Gendarmerie)
directive in the form of a 14 page manual was issued to officers
responsible for deportations allowing cushions to be put over
the faces of deportees both to gag them and to prevent them from
biting anyone.
This coincided roughly with the time that Semira Adamu entered
the picture. Semira came from a relatively wealthy family from
Lagos in southern Nigeria. She originally left Nigeria to escape
an arranged marriage to a much older, polygamous man. Her eventual
destination was Berlin, however the plane she was on made a stop-over
at Zaventem, where Semira fell foul of the "safe third country"
rule. She was then taken to Transit centre 127bis, where she
was questioned for the first time on March 26 and refused entry.
She appealed against this decision and after a second interview
also went against her a decision was made to forcibly deport
her. Semira was terrified by the thought of returning to Nigeria,
where she faced not only marrying somebody against her will but
also physical punishment by her family.
The authorities made five increasingly violent attempts to deport
her. After the fifth attempt, which was cancelled after the pilot
refused to fly with her, her lawyer stated that she had been
warned that all possible methods would be used to deport her
and that any violence used against her "would be her own
fault". Her lawyer added that Semira feared for her life.
By this time Semira had already become a cause celebre
and campaigners, increasingly concerned about Belgium's asylum
laws, had taken up her case. At the same time more and more reports
were published about the increasing violence involved with forced
deportations. A pilot working for the national airline company,
Sabena, appeared anonymously on a television programme describing
violent scenes he had witnessed during forced deportations. Semira's
case had already led to demonstrations outside Steenokkerzeel.
Finally, on September 20, two days before her death, Semira appeared
on television as part of a documentary about rejected asylum
seekers. In it she gave a graphic description of the fourth attempt
to deport her:
"I was woken at 6.30 a.m. and given twenty minutes to prepare for departure... When we arrived at the airport my hands and feet were bound and I was thrown into an isolation cell for over three hours. At 11.15 they forced me onto the plane. I began to scream and cry as I was surrounded by six gendarmes and two men from Sabena. The airline men pushed me around and one held a cushion to my face. He almost suffocated me. These men were supposed to accompany me all the way to Lome. Passengers intervened at this point, saying that they would get off the plane if the men did not let me go."
The events leading up to Semira's death were captured on video.
This time she was surrounded by 11 gendarmes as well as the standard
two airline company men. As ordinary passengers were boarding
the plane she was forced to bend down, put her face on a cushion
on the knee of one of the gendarmes and was held in that position
for about twenty minutes. At the end she lost consciousness.
She was immediately taken to St Luc Hospital in Brussels. Doctors
were unable to revive her and she died at 9.32pm.
The announcement of Semira's death led to spontaneous demonstrations
across Belgium. In Steenokkerzeel inmates went on immediate hunger
strike while hundreds of people surrounded the transit camp.
This led to Tobback closing the centre down and freeing the remaining
inmates. It was effectively his last decision as deputy prime
minister and home office minister. The day after Semira died
Tobback appeared at a press conference;
according to reporters he appeared shaken by the incident. He
defended the gendarmes involved, stating that they had handled
everything "by the book". He took full responsibility
for Semira's death, and stated even then that "... if it
were up to me then I would have already resigned. This has been
the worst day of my political life". Yet he appeared to
try to focus blame on campaigners who according to him "encouraged
deportees to resist". By Friday he decided that he would
have to go, following two revelations. First, it emerged that
one of the gendarmes
responsible for Semira's deportation had been suspended for a
month in January 1997 following allegations in the Het Volk newspaper
that he had mistreated a deportee. Second, the video of the incident
was shown to a shocked nation, revealing that the gendarmes had
been cracking jokes whilst holding the cushion over Semira's
face.
Luc Tempels, chief of security at Zaventem, also resigned his
position. He too claimed full responsibility for Semira's death:
"As commander of the security detachment at the national
airport I believe that I am officially responsible for the death
of Semira Adamu" he admitted. Two gendarmes have since been
charged with involuntary manslaughter and the Gendarmerie have
refused to carry out any more deportations. Thus the demand of
the Belgian greens (Ecolo-Agalev) for a six month moratorium
on deportations appears to have been met. Ecolo-Agalev stated
that:
"this was no unfortunate mistake of a gendarme, but a sad escalation of an inhuman asylum policy which for which successive Home Affairs ministers were responsible".
The Belgian greens were not alone in their condemnation of
the events surrounding Semira's death. The Christian trade union
conference (ACW) called a day's strike in Zaventem airport, pointing
that they had been warning for months that forced deportations
"could have fatal consequences". Other campaigners
demanded an immediate enquiry into the state of Belgium's asylum
laws.
However, according to Linda Delva of the Limburg Platform for
Refugees, the case reveals a deeper crisis within Belgian, and
by implication European asylum law. As Linda points out in an
interview with Elektronisch Nieuws, the rejection of Semira's
asylum claim took place in accordance with the 1951 Geneva Convention
relating to the status of refugees. This again raises the question
of the extent to which the Convention is capable or incapable
of recognising gender-specific or gender-related forms of persecution
and human rights abuse: "... the Geneva Convention doesn't
give any specific rights to women, or for that matter to refugees
from civil wars." Linda argues that "there are many
people who simply cannot return to their country of origin, even
if they don't meet the criteria laid down by the Geneva Convention".
... This is not the first time a deportee has died whilst being
expelled from "Fortress Europe". A Zairian man died
in 1986, also as a result of a cushion being placed over his
head, whilst being deported from Belgium. There was no enquiry
at the time. Nor was there an enquiry into the death of a Tamil
asylum seeker following his forcible deportation from France
in 1991. This case has only recently been investigated, (see
report in this issue). In the UK Joy Gardner's death, resulting
from her face being covered with masking tape whilst police attempted
to deport her is another notorious example. Three police officers
were later acquitted of her manslaughter, whilst police procedures
were reformed to exclude the use of mouth restraints (see Statewatch
Vol 3 no 4, Vol 4 no 3 and Vol 6 no 1).
Although the death of Semira Adamu has led to profound shock
in a country almost inured to political scandal, the Belgian
prime minister Jean-Luc Dehaene has committed himself to maintaining
the repressive immigration and asylum legislation introduced
by successive governments:
"We have no intention of reviewing our options for granting political asylum....those who are legally entitled to remain in the country must be integrated within Belgian society, those who have no legal right to be in the country cannot stay. After all we also have obligations vis a vis other European countries who face the same problems."
Since 1993 UNITED has monitored the results of the policies building "Fortress Europe". Their latest list includes 1,114 deaths which can be put down to border militarisations, asylum laws, detention policies, deportations and carrier sanctions, to the implementation of the Schengen Agreement and to the consequences of the Dublin Convention. UNITED commented:
"Her death is not a singular incident. The deaths of refugees are the symptoms of policies that no longer see the humanity of those fleeing their homeland, but prefer to see them as numbers, or worse, as a natural disaster, a "flood"."
Sources: Association pour le droit des
etrangers, Brussels; Solidair, 30.9.98; Elektronisch Nieuws;
Het Volk, 26.9.98; De Morgen, 24.9.98; Le Soir, 23-6.9.98; Magasile,
7.10.98; Liberation, 24.9.98; NRC Handelsblad Weekeditie, 29.9.98.
Statewatch
News online
| Join Statewatch news e-mail list | If you use this site regularly, you are encouraged
to make a donation
to Statewatch to support future research
Spotted an error? If you've spotted a problem with this page, just click once to let us know.
Statewatch does not have a corporate view, nor does it seek to create one, the views expressed are those of the author. Statewatch is not responsible for the content of external websites and inclusion of a link does not constitute an endorsement. Registered UK charity number: 1154784. Registered UK company number: 08480724. Registered company name: The Libertarian Research & Education Trust. Registered office: MayDay Rooms, 88 Fleet Street, London EC4Y 1DH. © Statewatch ISSN 1756-851X. Personal usage as private individuals "fair dealing" is allowed. We also welcome links to material on our site. Usage by those working for organisations is allowed only if the organisation holds an appropriate licence from the relevant reprographic rights organisation (eg: Copyright Licensing Agency in the UK) with such usage being subject to the terms and conditions of that licence and to local copyright law.