28 March 2012
Support our work: become a Friend of Statewatch from as little as £1/€1 per month.
UK/Belmarsh:
Committee of senior parliamentarians calls for Britain's "Guantanamo
Bay" to be scrapped as "a matter of urgency"
A
committee of senior parliamentarians - on the Privy Council Review
Committee - have produced a 120-page report on the Anti-Terrorism,
Crime and Security Act 2001 and called for end to the indefinite
internment of 14 people in the Belmarsh high security prison
in London - known as "Britain's Guantanamo Bay". Most
have been held since the autumn of 2001 and because there is
not sufficient evidence to bring them before a court they are
being held in jail - they do have the option to leave the country
which two have done. The committee says that these powers should
be replaced "as a matter of urgency"
Full-text of the Privy Counsellor Review Committee: Anti-Terrorism,
Crime and Security Act Review: Report (pdf)
The committee's report says that other countries have not found it necessary to derogate from the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and "we have found no obvious reason why the UK should be an exception" and goes on to conclude:
"We were surprised to learn that the authorities appear to have given no thought to what change in circumstances might lead them to conclude that an individual should be released or dealt with differently... From the evidence we have received, we are concerned that there has not been a sufficiently pro-active, focused, case management approach to determining whether any particular suspected international terrorist should continue to be detained under Part Four [of the ATCS 2001].. nor did it appear that alternative ways of dealing with them were under active consideration"
The committee argues that these suspects should "be prosecuted under normal criminal law whenever possible", if necessary by making changes in the law to allow telecommunications interceptions (eg: phone-tap recording) to be used in court.
The committee also records that only foreign nationals can be detained indefinitely without trial in Belmarsh prison, whereas "the threat from UK citizens is real.. we have been told that, of the people of interest to the authorities because of their suspected involvement in international terrorism, nearly half are British citizens".
The Home Secretary, David Blunkett, responded immediately to reject the recommendation. He said that:
"I am not convinced that the current threat leaves us with any option but to continue to use these powers... These were not powers I assumed lightly. I have never pretended that they are ideal, but I firmly believe that they are currently the best and most workable way to address the particular problems we face...
I believe that I would be failing in my duty of public protection if the Part 4 powers were removed from the armoury of measures available to protect the United Kingdom from specific terrorist threats."
1. Full-text of the Privy Counsellor Review Committee: Anti-Terrorism, Crime and Security Act
Review: Report (pdf)
2. Guantanamo Bay:
The legal black hole: Twenty-Seventh F.A. Mann Lecture: 25 November
2003 By Johan Steyn [Lord Steyn is a judicial member of the House
of Lords - the UK's supreme court]: Lecture (html) Lecture (pdf version)
Spotted an error? If you've spotted a problem with this page, just click once to let us know.
Statewatch does not have a corporate view, nor does it seek to create one, the views expressed are those of the author. Statewatch is not responsible for the content of external websites and inclusion of a link does not constitute an endorsement. Registered UK charity number: 1154784. Registered UK company number: 08480724. Registered company name: The Libertarian Research & Education Trust. Registered office: MayDay Rooms, 88 Fleet Street, London EC4Y 1DH. © Statewatch ISSN 1756-851X. Personal usage as private individuals "fair dealing" is allowed. We also welcome links to material on our site. Usage by those working for organisations is allowed only if the organisation holds an appropriate licence from the relevant reprographic rights organisation (eg: Copyright Licensing Agency in the UK) with such usage being subject to the terms and conditions of that licence and to local copyright law.