News

Privacy International launch campaign for consumers to obtain their records from telecommunications companies: Report

Privacy International have launched a "Know your data" campaign in the UK to enable people to write to their telecommunications providers asking for details of records held on them. The campaign provides three models letters
Privacy International have launched a "Know your data" campaign in the UK to enable people to write to their telecommunications providers asking for details of records held on them. The campaign provides three models letters
Privacy International have launched a “Know your data” campaign in the UK to enable people to write to their telecommunications providers asking for details of records held on them. The campaign provides three models letters to be sent to providers. See – Privacy International: “Know your data” campaign From Privacy International: “Many of the companies that supply Britain’s communications services – the landline services, cable companies, mobile operators and Internet Service Providers – are accumulating a vast amount of personal information about their customers. This “communications data”, which is currently stored for up to seven years, may relate to all the calls you have made and that you received, who you are in contact with, the geographic location of your mobile calls, the emails you have sent and which you received, the websites you have visited, the television programmes you have watched, personal financial data and other personal information about you and your family. Combined, this extraordinary array of data creates a comprehensive dossier on the contacts, friendships, interests, transactions, movements and personal information of almost everyone in the UK. Communications providers do not need to retain all this information, but many of them are doing so as a result of negotiations with the government. Law enforcement, investigative and national security organisations have argued for years that the data is useful to detect, prevent or prosecute criminal activity. The Anti-Terrorism, Crime and Security Act, passed in the months following the September 11th attacks, gives the government power to require companies to keep this information if the companies already retain it for business purposes. While these rules are being settled, the vast data reserves of an undisclosed number of companies have been placed at the disposal of government. BT (to give just one example) has fully automated its service to government to the point where any information on any BT customer going back seven years can be obtained by any authorised government agency merely by sending an email. 02 also keeps its data for up to seven years. Details of hundreds of thousands of consumers involving millions of communications are surrendered each year by communications providers. This activity has occurred for years without legal authority and in violation of the Data Protection Act. The Home Office attempted in 2002 to authorise under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 an even more extensive list of public authorities who could access this communications data, but following a public outcry was forced to temporarily withdraw the proposal. This unprecedented access would have been available – as indeed it is currently – without any judicial oversight. The Home Office is now consulting over these issues before taking further action, but the two consultation documents it has published indicate that the current surveillance regime is likely to be made universal. So far as the vast majority of providers are concerned, the only issue to be resolved is the level of subsidy that should be offered by the government for access to their customers’ information. The negotiations have been in progress for more than three years. The communications providers have complained constantly to government that the cost of providing this information is greater than the level of subsidy offered to them. They have said little or nothing about the privacy rights of their customers. And yet, for years, they have acted illegally by retaining and disclosing their customers’ information. These activities and negotiations take place in secret. Scrutiny an