28 March 2012
Support our work: become a Friend of Statewatch from as little as £1/€1 per month.
The following is a list of changes to the asylum procedures directive in its latest version (Council doc. 14330/03, 7 Nov. 2003), as compared to the prior version.
New issues raised regarding Articles 1-22
These articles were agreed at the JHA Council of June 2003 (Council doc. 10235/03), but some Member States have raised fresh reservations as follows:
- Art. 3: one MS has suggested applying the Directive to applications for subsidiary protection in all MS applying a single procedure
- Art. 3(2): the UK has a reservation re non-applicability of the Directive to applications submitted to representations of Member States, but it is not clear what the concern is
- [art 7(5) has been deleted];
- Art. 8(2): one MS wants an exception from the obligation to state reasons for a rejection in writing if the applicant is given an equivalent status [nb this would impact on the ability of a person with SP status to appeal a GC refusal]
- Art. 10: one MS wants the option to drop a personal interview where the authorities think any of the fifteen possible cases of unfounded applications set out in Art. 23(4) are applicable [nb this would be the first exception from the rule that the basic standards in Chapter II of the Directive apply to all admissible applications except for border and repeat applications; note that the personal interview can already be dropped in cases of applications covered by the Dublin rules]
- Art. 13: new UK reservations would restrict the right to legal aid and legal representation; there are other reservations, including an argument to limit legal aid in principle only to those who entered or reside legally
- Art. 19: one MS wants to indicate that MS are not obliged to provide for a procedure for explicit withdrawal of applications
Articles 23-45
- Art. 23(4)(g): apparently minor amendment
- Art. 23(4)(k): widens scope of exception re whether application can be unfounded due to failure to cooperate with authorities
- Art. 23(4)(o): new condition placed on treating application as 'unfounded' where child applies separately [there must be no new elements raised in the application]
- Art. 25(3)(e): clarify ground of inadmissibility on ground that person has been permitted to stay on other grounds; made clear that person can make fresh application that will be considered on the merits
- Art. 25(3)(f): the word 'final' is dropped; this appears to be a technical amendment since the word still appears at the outset
- Art. 29(1): replaces 'reject' with 'consider'; appears to be technical change
- Art. 33(1)(b): first change (deletes reference to 'on the previous application' appears technical; second change (previously permitted application of procedure only after a final decision; [note that it is possible to prevent further appeals on the merits at an early point in the procedure]
- Art. 33(4): liberalized possibility of reopening procedure in other cases (was restricted to cases where reasons raise significant likelihood of successful application)
- Art. 35(6): requirement to notify Commission re border procedures has been dropped
- Art. 37(1): one possibility of dropping procedural protection in withdrawal cases is expressly spelt out
- Art. 38(2): drops reference to idea that relevant facts can already have been defined, and adds possibility of restriction of judicial control to Wednesbury reasonableness only
- Art. 38(3): new possibility to provide effective remedy for persons with equivalent status only after they lose that status
- Art. 39: suspensive effect clause rewritten: reintroduces possibility of right to stay until court rules on appeal or request to stay; derogations would only apply to the first category
- Art. 39(2)(d): also an exception where application rejected in border procedure
- Art. 39(4), on obligation to inform of possibilities of challenging decision, is deleted
- Art. 43: new provision on possible application of Directive to pending cases
EU law on asylum procedures: An assault on human rights?
MEP tables formal complaint on transfer of personal data to USA
Spotted an error? If you've spotted a problem with this page, just click once to let us know.
Statewatch does not have a corporate view, nor does it seek to create one, the views expressed are those of the author. Statewatch is not responsible for the content of external websites and inclusion of a link does not constitute an endorsement. Registered UK charity number: 1154784. Registered UK company number: 08480724. Registered company name: The Libertarian Research & Education Trust. Registered office: MayDay Rooms, 88 Fleet Street, London EC4Y 1DH. © Statewatch ISSN 1756-851X. Personal usage as private individuals "fair dealing" is allowed. We also welcome links to material on our site. Usage by those working for organisations is allowed only if the organisation holds an appropriate licence from the relevant reprographic rights organisation (eg: Copyright Licensing Agency in the UK) with such usage being subject to the terms and conditions of that licence and to local copyright law.