28 March 2012
Support our work: become a Friend of Statewatch from as little as £1/€1 per month.
EU-PNR: UK
parliament committee still has proposal under scrutiny
- Government
has not even sent the latest draft Directive to parliament, how
many other national parliaments has this happened to?
The UK parliament's Select Committee on the European Union in
the House of Lords have written to the Home Office saying that
they: "are not prepared to clear the document from scrutiny"
- in a letter dated 21 April 2004 to which no reply has been
received (see: full-text below). The letter from Lord Grenfell,
the chair of the Committee, also asks the Home Office if it is
"intended to deposit" the latest draft of the
proposal (doc 8058/04) which the Justice and Home Affairs Council
is intending to adopted as a "A" Point (that is, without
debate) at its meeting in Luxembourg on Thursday 29 April.
Under UK parliamentary
rules all documents on EU matters have to be deposited then referred
to the relevant Committee for them to discuss and take a view
- in this case the proposal, dated 1 April 2004, has still not
been sent over to parliament.
Lord Grenfell's letter contains substantive criticisms of the
proposal:
1. It says the Committee "remains unconvinced of the justification of the proposal and its proportionality to the potential benefits". It notes that the intended UK Advance Passenger Information System (APIS) will only be of value in spotting those already on a "watch-list" and that the proposal "effectiveness in countering organised crime and security threats" has not been "substantiated".
2. It now appears that the obligation on carriers to hand over passenger name records (PNR) in the Directive "will not apply to intra-EU flights - contrary to what you told us when you gave evidence to us" (a reference to evidence from Caroline Flint MP, Home Office Minister). The Committee also asks where the government has:
"consulted the Commission about the proportionality of this aspect of your proposals in relation to Community law on freedom of movement"
3. The Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA) shows every sign of "having been put together at the last minute".
4. The Committee questions the late change in the proposed Directive which would exempt from the requirement to delete data within 24 hours where it is "needed later" for law enforcement purposes. The letter says "this appears to be a very wide exception".
Documents
1. Lord Grenfell's letter to the Home Office, 21.4.04: HoL Letter (pdf)
2 Council Directive on the obligation of carriers to communicate
passenger data: 8058/04 (pdf)
3. Council Directive: Common Guidelines: 8842/04 (26.4.04) (pdf)
and see: 27.4.04:
EU-PNR: JHA Council to agree the surveillance of all airline
passengers: Report and documents
Spotted an error? If you've spotted a problem with this page, just click once to let us know.
Statewatch does not have a corporate view, nor does it seek to create one, the views expressed are those of the author. Statewatch is not responsible for the content of external websites and inclusion of a link does not constitute an endorsement. Registered UK charity number: 1154784. Registered UK company number: 08480724. Registered company name: The Libertarian Research & Education Trust. Registered office: MayDay Rooms, 88 Fleet Street, London EC4Y 1DH. © Statewatch ISSN 1756-851X. Personal usage as private individuals "fair dealing" is allowed. We also welcome links to material on our site. Usage by those working for organisations is allowed only if the organisation holds an appropriate licence from the relevant reprographic rights organisation (eg: Copyright Licensing Agency in the UK) with such usage being subject to the terms and conditions of that licence and to local copyright law.