28 March 2012
Support our work: become a Friend of Statewatch from as little as £1/€1 per month.
EU: Call
for a new intelligence centre to be set up
- Spanish
intelligence knew that the government's "support of the military intervention in
Iraq by the United States and its Allies constitutes without
doubt a further risk factor for Spain"
The Belgian Prime Minister, Guy Verhofstadt, has called
for the EU to set up a new "intelligence centre" in
the wake of the Madrid bombings. This would, he suggests, play
a coordinating role by bringing together member state police,
security, intelligence agencies and Europol and by sharing intelligence
make an analysis of the terrorist threat. The Netherlands and
Austrian governments are said to back the idea.
Mr Verhofstadt is quoted as saying that Europol has not succeeded in providing a "coherent" anti-terrorist policy (eupolitix.com). According to the Financial Times an internal report published just before the Madrid bombings, prepared by Mr Solana's team wrote:
"A number of instruments exist already within the
Union to improve operational co-operation and co-ordination.
They are however badly used, ratification of conventions is slow
and the instruments are poorly used and/or poorly understood
by law enforcement and judicial authorities in some member states."
This argument appears to carry some weight as Europol has had
responsibility for terrorism since July 1999 when it became "operational".
All member states supplied experts on terrorism. In 2000 Europol
opened a "Analysis work file" on "extremist Islamic
terrorism" in the EU. After the attacks on New York and
Washington in September 2001 EU Justice Ministers agreed on the
creation of "a team of counter-terrorist specialists in
Europol with member states appointing liaison officers from their
police and intelligence services" (Europol itself already
had seven counter-terrorist officers).
On 3 December 2003 Europol published a "Non-confidential report on terrorist activity in the European Union from October 2002 to October 2003, full-text: 15877/2/02 (pdf). The assessment provided by Spanish police and intelligence to the Europol report on "Islamic extremist terrorism" reads as follows:
"Spain
The various terrorist groups comprising the so-called Islamic
World Front (under the leadership of al Qaeda, as well
as the advocates of internationalisation of Jihad on a global
scale, continue to pose the greatest threat to our interests
as well as to the interests of the other EU Member States. The
Spanish Governments support of the military intervention
in Iraq by the United States and its Allies constitutes without
doubt a further risk factor for Spain, even though it might not
be the most decisive or dangerous one.
In this sense, the attack targeting the Spanish Cultural Institute
Casa de España in Casablanca (Morocco) could possibly
be related not only to the armed conflict in Iraq, but also to
other factors, notably the campaign carried out in the course
of the last few months by radical Islamist groups (including
Assirat Al Moustaquim and other currents connected to Salafia
Jihadiya), targeting the western life style and moral decay and
reverting to violent actions against persons who are considered
to have strayed from the righteous path and places
such as entertainment centres or places where alcohol is being
sold.
On the other hand, the detention of two Moroccan citizens involved
in the Casablanca suicide attack emphasizes the growing presence
of radical Muslim elements in particular mosques, Koran centres
etc., using these locations as clandestine centres for developing
various activities, mainly logistic and financial tasks related
to radical Islamism professing international Jihad (procurement,
accommodation, obtaining economic resources, propaganda, diffusion
of extremist ideas...) At the same time, it has to be pointed
out that the amount of travelling and mutual visits throughout
various European countries gives evidence of the narrow ties
and relations that go beyond common
positions on an ideological level.
The dismantlement of the al Qaeda financial network has not only
proved to be a very important step representing a heavy blow
to the logistic and financial infrastructure of the organization,
but also revealed details of the financing operations concerning
planning and conducting of the attack targeting the synagogue
in Djerba (Tunisia), as well as connections to members of the
group commanded by Mohamed Atta, who were detected in Spain and
who fled the country shortly before the attacks of 11th September.
The stance taken by our country regarding the support of the
military intervention in Iraq has, indeed, caused great animosity
in the Palestine population of the Occupied Territories as well
as in various Islamic countries In some cases, during manifestations
protesting against the military invasion of Iraq the slogans
were directed not only against the USA and the United Kingdom,
but also against Spain. In one of the manifestations the photograph
of José María Aznar was included among the national
leaders constituting the Axis of Evil directed against
the Arab world.
The perpetration of the recent attacks in Riyadh (Saudi Arabia)
and Casablanca (Morocco), and the risk of terrorist attacks being
perpetrated in particular geographical areas (South East Asia,
Maghrib, Horn of Africa and the Arabian Peninsula) lead to assume
that armed Islamist groups tend to intensify the number of violent
attacks of as well as the destructive effects of these attacks.
These would most probably be spectacular, blind, murderous, and
indiscriminate terrorist actions intended to cause the highest
possible number of victims.
Concerning the modus operandi, suicide attack will probably continue
to be the first choice, as can be concluded from the directives
given by Number 2 of al Qaeda, Ayman al Zawahiri, in audio tape
broadcast by Al Jazeera.
While the audio tape mentioned above did explicitly allude to
damaging the interests of the USA, United Kingdom, Australia
and Norway, as well as calling for armed attacks against the
Jews, Ayman al Zawahiri challenged the Muslims to expel
the Americans and other invaders from their respective countries
which amounts to say that every Western country could become
a victim of violent attacks.
On the other hand, the fact that the majority of Western
countries have enhanced and/or tightened their security measures
protecting particular potential targets (diplomatic legations,
airports, ports, nuclear plants, merchandise transports, military
facilities...) could lead the terrorists to revert to attacking
"soft" targets (hotels, tourist facilities, cultural,
economic or historic buildings of symbolic character etc.) as
well as using conventional methods to minimize possible practical
complications at the moment of perpetrating the attack.
Finally, it has to be pointed out that, bearing in mind the insisting
proclamations of Ayman al Zawahiri referring to the necessity
of expelling foreigners from Muslim countries, and the threats
directed at the Western countries mentioned above, the risk of
perpetrating attacks targeted against various Peacekeeping missions
conducted by Western countries in geographical conflict zones
like Iraq or Afghanistan has to be considered as high and growing.
Beyond that, other Arab countries could become the scene of attacks
directed against Western interests as Ayman al Zawahiri explicitly
accused Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain, Egypt, Yemen, and
Jordan of "opening their lands, their air space and their
territorial waters to crusader troops that invaded Iraq".
Spotted an error? If you've spotted a problem with this page, just click once to let us know.
Statewatch does not have a corporate view, nor does it seek to create one, the views expressed are those of the author. Statewatch is not responsible for the content of external websites and inclusion of a link does not constitute an endorsement. Registered UK charity number: 1154784. Registered UK company number: 08480724. Registered company name: The Libertarian Research & Education Trust. Registered office: MayDay Rooms, 88 Fleet Street, London EC4Y 1DH. © Statewatch ISSN 1756-851X. Personal usage as private individuals "fair dealing" is allowed. We also welcome links to material on our site. Usage by those working for organisations is allowed only if the organisation holds an appropriate licence from the relevant reprographic rights organisation (eg: Copyright Licensing Agency in the UK) with such usage being subject to the terms and conditions of that licence and to local copyright law.