28 March 2012
Support our work: become a Friend of Statewatch from as little as £1/€1 per month.
Statewatch analysis
Italy: Tough new anti-terrorist laws adopted (this analysis as a pdf file)
"an intervention
to make existing norms sharper and more incisive in the fight
against terrorism"
Giuseppe Pisanu, the Italian Interior Minister)
"allows law enforcement authorities to interrogate suspects
without the suspect having a lawyer present, thus eliminating
an important safeguard against torture as well as a protection
of the right to a fair trial" (Amnesty International)
"it will also be possible for an executive authority
(a prefect) - not a judge - to expel from Italy a person who
is residing in Italy legally, determining that expulsion on prima
facie evidence that the person poses a security threat to Italy"
(Amnesty International)
"it gives the secret services the possibility to intercept
[communications]; it makes the storage of telephone and IT traffic
data obligatory for an unreasonable time" (Mauro Paissan,
Italian Data Protection Ombudsman's Authority)
"Muslims must go around in jacket and trousers so as
to avoid there being any covered body parts, otherwise there
could be a terrorist under every robe" Giancarlo Gentilini,
Lega Nord mayor of Treviso)
On 1 August 2005, a new
anti-terrorist law came into force in Italy only five days after
the government had presented the decree that the Council of Ministers
(the Italian cabinet) had approved on 22 July 2005. It includes
a string of anti-terrorist measures in response to the terrorist
attacks in the London public transport services on 7 July. The
decree followed a heated public debate which often strayed into
racism, as a result of the threat issued by Al Qaida against
Italy in relation to its presence in Iraq and of the increasingly
intolerant discourse of MPs and ministers from the Lega Nord.
Giuseppe Pisanu, the Italian Interior Minister, explained that
measures in the decree's nineteen articles were not "exceptional"
but rather, an:
"intervention to make existing norms sharper and more
incisive in the fight against terrorism"
Although the claim was aimed at reducing concern over the measures
that were to be adopted, a closer reading of the law suggests
that it features the adoption of "exceptional" measures
on a permanent basis. The inclusion of measures to make data
retention compulsory until 31 December 2007, the limiting of
judicial oversight and increased political involvement in expulsions
and investigative activities, and powers given to the army to
search and detain terrorist suspects are examples of this. The
law (whose title admits that it is aimed at tackling "international
terrorism and crime") also sanctions a departure from ordinary
procedure for practices such as detention, searches, surveillance
or the adoption of restrictive measures for cases involving terrorist
offences, expands the definition of terrorist conduct in line
with the definition adopted at an EU level, and increases punishment
for individuals contravening restrictive measures imposed upon
them.
Amnesty International spoke out against some of the provisions
that were proposed, arguing that the decree:
"allows law enforcement authorities to interrogate suspects
without the suspect having a lawyer present, thus eliminating
an important safeguard against torture as well as a protection
of the right to a fair trial"
and that
"it will also be possible for an executive authority
(a prefect) - not a judge - to expel from Italy a person who
is residing in Italy legally, determining that expulsion on prima
facie evidence that the person poses a security threat to Italy"
Although this measure was altered to allow the interior minister
to order expulsions and to make the prefetto's power to do so
dependent on authorisation by the interior minister, the oversight
over this measure has become political rather than judicial.
Mauro Paissan from the Italian data protection ombudsman's authority
also expressed his concern:
"it gives the secret services the possibility to intercept
[communications]; it makes the storage of telephone and IT traffic
data obligatory for an unreasonable time"
The measures adopted by the Council of Ministers applied to internal
terrorism, or terrorist activity against other countries or international
organisations (the last two of these were first introduced in
Italy following the 11-S attacks in the US, see Statewatch vol.
11 no. 5), and have a number of purposes. In the first place,
they limit judicial oversight and remove some guarantees for
suspects, as well as legal restrictions applying to the expulsion
of foreigners whose presence in the country is deemed to benefit
terrorism "in any way" (potentially on the basis of
secret evidence). They offer the possibility of obtaining long
term residence permits for "illegal" migrants who cooperate
with authorities by providing information to combat terrorist
activities, decree mandatory telecommunications data retention
until 31 December 2007 and expand powers to intercept communications
to the secret services.
New terrorist offences are introduced, such as the recruitment
or training of terrorists or the transmission of information
that may be used to commit violent acts for terrorist purposes,
and behaviour that has terrorist goals (increasing sanctions
for "apologia", or justification). The period during
which suspects can be interrogated without a lawyer being present
is increased from 12 to 24 hours (the limit for such interrogations
was reduced to 12 hours after the death of Pinelli, an anarchist
suspected of involvement in the Piazza Fontana bombing which
was later found to have been the work of right wingers, who died
after falling out of a window during an interrogation in 1969).
Also the creation of inter-force investigation units on order
from the interior minister is envisaged for investigations into
terrorist offences. The requirement of prior authorisation is
introduced for telecommunication service providers (a license
subject to the establishment of procedures to comply with data
retention and user monitoring provisions), people "importing,
trading, transporting and using" detonators and explosives
or instructing people in their use (with possible sentences of
between one and six years), and flight activity over Italian
territory. The exclusive power of the judicial police to exercise
some of its functions is circumscribed in scope and extended
to other bodies (such as the prison police in urgent cases involving
detainees). Sanctions for possession, use and manufacturing of
false documents are increased, and possession of a false document
will also become a circumstance that allows immediate detention,
as it is to be considered evidence of the likelihood of a suspect
fleeing.
The amended law which emerged on 31 July after scrutiny in the
Senate (two days) and parliament (one day) featured the introduction
of measures including:
- the granting of powers to personnel from the army involved
in anti-terrorist surveillance to search or detain suspects for
anti-terrorist purposes;
- the extension of the power to conduct undercover operations
(using IT facilities) to the postal police;
- the extension of the need for a special license to any kind
of establishment where telephones or terminals are made available
for use by the public, customers or members (except for public
payphones, but applicable to call centres);
- a clear statement of the fact that when appeals are filed by
people against whom an expulsion order has been filed for anti-terrorist
purposes, the expulsion will not be suspended under any circumstance
pending appeal;
- the allocation of special funding to develop anti-terrorist
security in airports and for the coming Winter Olympics in Turin;
- increased sanctions against people "taking part in public
demonstrations.. in public spaces
using helmets or with
the face partially or completely covered" (from one to six
months and fines of between 25 to 100 euros- to one to two years
and fines of between 1,000 and 2,000 euros).
This last measure caused a degree of controversy, because it
was viewed as a measure that the LN had proposed to prevent Muslim
women from wearing veils or burqas in public places, thus criminalising
an entire community. A closer reading indicates that it is aimed
at people wearing helmets or whose face is partially or completely
covered, obstructing their identification, during demonstrations
in public spaces or when police officers request to identify
them. As a consequence, in theory, this measure is as likely
to affect demonstrators (increasing punishment for specified
forms of behaviour on demonstrations) as women wearing a veil.
However, there have already been reports that two women have
already been arrested for wearing a veil in Venice, leading the
Venice general prosecutor to state that it is not a punishable
offence to wear a veil or burqa in public, unless the wearer
refuses to uncover her face when police seek to identify her.
Nonetheless, in the north-eastern city of Treviso, the notorious
LN mayor, Giancarlo Gentilini, declared that "this kind
of clothing is inadmissible in a moment like this", adding
that he was also opposed to the wearing of robes:
"Muslims must go around in jacket and trousers so as
to avoid there being any covered body parts, otherwise there
could be a terrorist under every robe"
Outline of the contents of the law
Art. 1 extends the power to privately interview detainees, previously
limited to personnel from the Antimafia Investigative Direction,
to officials at a province level of the police and carabinieri
for investigations concerning terrorism, as well as to judicial
police and customs police officers in relation to the financing
of terrorism, in order to acquire information "for the prevention
and repression of crimes commited for terrorist purposes or to
subvert the democratic order".
Art. 2 decrees that foreigners whose stay in the country must
be ensured as a result of their cooperation with the authorities
in the course of "police operations, investigations or proceedings"
into terrorist offences, will be granted a special residence
permit lasting no less than a year. The request for the permit
will have to be motivated, with reference to the "relevance
of the contribution" made by the foreigner, and the permit
will be renewable for reasons of "justice or public security"
and may be withdrawn in the case of conduct which is "incompatible"
with the reasons for which it was issued. If the contribution
by the foreigner is deemed "extraordinary" in terms
of preventing terrorist attacks threatening the life or physical
integrity of persons, or of lessening their effects, a carta
di soggiorno (long-term residence permit) may be issued.
Art.3 allows the prefetto (local police chief) to order the immediate
expulsion of foreigners concerning whom there are reasons to
believe that their stay in Italy may benefit terrorist organisations
or activities "in any way". Following amendments, this
provision was made subject to authorisation to do so, to be granted
by the Interior Minister, who is also given authority to order
expulsions. This measure applies to persons who have been accused
or found guilty, or have had special conditions applied to them,
because they are considered to be involved in the carrying out
of criminal acts that offend or threaten public security and
peace. The expulsion may be suspended if the conditions for granting
the foreigner a residence permit as envisaged in article 2 (the
provision of useful information for the prevention of terrorist
activities) apply. Expulsion orders may be appealed before regional
administrative courts, although appeals may be suspended for
up to two years, if state secrecy regulations apply, and amendments
to the original text state clearly that appeals will not result
in a suspension of the execution of the expulsion.
Art. 4 allows the Prime Minister to instruct the directors of
the secret services to request a judicial authorisation to carry
out "preventative telephone interceptions", if they
are considered "indispensable" to prevent terrorist
or subversive activities. Amendments specify that the general
prosecutor in the appeal court of the district where the person
to be placed under surveillance is located is responsible for
the authorisation.
Art.5 allows the setting up of inter-force investigating units
composed by experts, officials and officers from the police forces
and judicial police by the Interior Minister if they are needed
for judicial police investigations related to terrorist offences.
Art. 6 concerns telephone and IT traffic data. Until 31 December
2007, the decree orders the suspension of the implementation
of any measures that order or allow the deletion of telephone
or IT-based communication traffic data allowing to trace access
and services, and that they must be stored until that date by
providers of any communication network that is open to the public,
except for those for which a longer storage period is provided.
Traffic data will include data concerning telephone calls that
were not answered. The use of data stored beyond the limit imposed
in June 2003 (thirty months for telephone calls which may be
extended by a further 24 months, whereas a new requirement to
store data relating to IT-based communications introduces a minimum
retention period of six months, which may be extended by six
months) will only be allowed for the purposes of this decree.
It will be compulsory for telecommunication service providers
to acquire personal data contained in an official identity document
presented by a customer before issuing a SIM card. An amendment
introduced for "urgent" cases, in which "delay
could seriously prejudice investigations", allows prosecuting
magistrates to apply for access to telephone traffic data by
a fast-track procedure lasting a maximum of three days.
Art. 7 introduces the requirement to obtain a special licence
to provide telecommunication services, whose granting will be
subject to the establishment of procedures to monitor the users'
operations and to store data, as well as for the collection of
personal data as envisaged above. Amendments extend the need
to obtain this license to any establishment or any kind of private
club providing terminals for people to carry out telephone or
IT communications, excluding public payphones, and establish
deadlines for obtaining these licenses.
Art.7 bis (amendment) expands the power to conduct undercover
IT activities for the purpose of combating terrorist activities
or activities that further terrorism, including getting in contact
or activating groups or indivuals, without any crime they may
commit in the process to obtain evidence being punishable, to
the postal police (the police, carabinieri and customs forces
already had the possibility to do so).
Art. 8 introduces special limits or conditions for the importing,
trade, transport and use of specified detonators and explosives.
Instruction in the use of explosives is to be subject to a prior
authorisation granted by the questore (in charge of the administration
of public security in any given province), and can be withdrawn
if specified circumstances apply. Contravening this provision
may lead to sentences of between one and six years, unless aggravating
circumstances apply.
Art. 9 allows the interior minister to decree that a prior authorisation
by the questore should also apply to permits to fly and to undergo
instruction to fly, for a specific period of between six months
and two years, in order to ascertain that there are no concerns
regarding the people concerned in relation to public order and
security, or State security. This authorisation may also be required
of people who are licensed to carry out this activity, "for
serious reasons of public order and security", who seek
to fly over the Italian territory. If the questore's authorisation
is not issued, any previous licenses or permits that have been
granted will be withdrawn, and those issued by other countries
will not be valid in Italian territory. "For serious public
order or security reasons", an amendment makes flying activity
from, towards or through Italy subject to a prior permission
to be issued by the questore.
Art. 9 bis (amendment) provides 2,500,000 euros in funding for
investment by the Ente Nazionale per l'Aviazione Civile (National
Agency for Civil Aviation) in measures to improve security in
airports in an anti-terrorist key.
Art.10 deals with personal identification. The limit for police
detention to identify or question a person will be extended from
12 to 24 hours, and its scope will be broadened from someone
who "has been charged by the judicial authority" to
include "a person who is under investigation by the same
authority or by the judicial police". People in possession
of false documents (amended from "users") are to be
punished with between one and four years' imprisonment, and half
(up from a third) of this sanction will apply to people who make
or develop the false document, without using it themselves. If
necessary, DNA samples may be taken from a detained person, after
prior authorisation has been given by a prosecuting magistrate,
if the person in question does not authorise it. Amendments were
introduced stating that hair or saliva samples would be the source
of the DNA profiles, and that sanctions for "taking part
in public demonstartions.. in public spaces
using helmets
or with the face partially or completely covered" are to
be increased to between one and two years in prison and fines
of between 1,000 and 2,000 Euros.
Art.11 decrees that electronic residence permits and carta di
soggiorno (long-term residence permit) are to be issued using
advanced technological means against counterfeiting, in accordance
with the uniform forms that apply to permits for third-country
citizens in EC Regulation 1030/2002.
Art. 12 introduces the duty to check any judicial precedents
that are reported involving a person who is under investigation
or has been charged, either previous or subsequent to the acts
for which the charges have been brought or investigations initiated,
and even if the person has used an alias.
Art. 13 arrest and detention - the lower threshold for the obligatory
immediate arrest of people caught in the act of committing a
crime for terrorist or subversive purposes (regardless of whether
it has been committed or attempted) that is liable to be punished
with sentences of between five and ten years, is lowered to four
years. The making, possession or use of a false identification
document is added to the list of offences to which this measure
applies. Measures for the detention of people against whom serious
evidence exists, who are not caught in the act but are deemed
to be liable to flee, are extended from offences relating to
"war weapons and explosives" to crimes committed for
terrorist or subversive purposes, and the requirement for this
measure to be taken "specific elements that lend credibility
to the risk that the suspect may be about to flee" is changed
to "specific elements, like the possession of false documents,
that lend credibility to the risk that the suspect may be about
to flee".
Art. 14 The failure to comply with obligations and prohibitions
that apply to the special surveillance of "persons who are
a threat to public security and morality" will result in
imprisonment for between one and five years, and is subject to
obligatory arrest even when the person concerned is not caught
in the act. The measure also applies, for instance, to someone
leaving an "obligatory place of residence" that has
been decreed (two to five years). Moreover, this article also
allows the freezing of assets when there are sufficient elements
to inform the UN Sanctions Committee, the conditions defined
in EC Regulation n. 881/2002 of 27 May 2002 apply, and the assets
may be "dispersed, hidden or used to finance terrorist activites".
In such cases, the competent public prosecutor must be informed
of the case by the financial security committee.
Art.15 introduces new types of criminal activity to be treated
as terrorist, including 1) the recruitment of terrorists, (which
may be sanctioned with between seven and fifteen years in prison);
2) their training or the provision of information on explosives,
weapons or techniques for carrying out acts of violence (sanctionable
with between five and ten years in prison with the same sanction
being applicable to the recipient of training or information);
and 3) conducts that have terrorist goals, which are loosely
defined as behaviour that, for its nature or context "may
harm a country or international organisation" and "is
committed to intimidate a population or to force public authorities
or an international organisation to carry out or abstain from
carrying out any act or to destabilise or destroy the fundamental
political, constitutional, economic and social structures of
a country or international organisation". Amendments specified
that "acts of violence" referred to "sabotage
of essential public services, with terrorist aims", expanded
the list of instances of terrorist activity to include a definition
that is almost identical to that approved by the EU in the Framework
decision on terrorism, and the sentences for instigating or justifying
("apologia") criminal activities are increased by half
for "terrorist" crimes or "crimes against humanity".
Art. 16 prohibits the adoption of judicial initiatives involving
terrorist activities without authorisation from the justice minister.
Legal guarantees in the codice di procedura penale (procedural
criminal code) concerning practices such as police detention,
searches of individuals or places of residence, the adoption
of restrictive measures against individuals, identification,
the interception of communications or conversations and interrogations,
which decree that any evidence obtained without following the
relevant procedure in these areas cannot be used, are decreed
not to apply to terrorist offences.
Art. 17 In proceedings involving prisoners or prisoners awaiting
appeal, prison police officers are allowed to issue notifications
(previously a competence of the judicial police or officers)
subject to authorisation by a judge, and their exclusive competency
to notify decisions adopted by prosecuting magistrates is limited
to "investigations or measures that the judicial police
itself has been delegated to carry out or has a duty to execute".
Art. 18 allows private security guards and companies to to carry
out subsidiary security functions in ports, railway and metro
stations, including vehicles and deposits, for which the exercise
of public duties or membership of police forces is not required.
The ministry of infrastructure and transport is in charge of
adopting a decree in cooperation with the Interior Minister,
to regulate the scope, procedure and personal requirements for
carrying out these functions, as well as the "functional
characteristics of the technical equipment" that may be
used, and any prohibitions that are deemed necessary to carry
out this surveillance activity, for whose costs the users of
these services will pay. Amendments added the requirement to
ensure "the dignity of persons" alongside "security",
and detail some lines of funding to be made available, as well
as special measures concerning the staging of the Winter Olympics
in Turin.
Art.19 allows the interior minister to authorise the issuing
of urgent funding for crisis situations by the chief of police,
the general director of public security, who may delegate this
function to the prefetti.
Sources
Law decree, Council of
Ministers, 22.7.2005, "Nuove norme per il contrasto del
terrorismo internazionale e della criminalità"; available
at:
http://www.interno.it/legislazione/pages/articolo.php?idarticolo=646
; and
http://www.cittadinolex.kataweb.it/article_view.jsp?idArt=29519&idCat=54
;
The text, published in the Gazzetta Ufficiale (Official Journal) n. 177, dated 1 August 2005, of the amendments to the law: http://gazzette.comune.jesi.an.it/2005/177/3.htm ;
The annotated final text
(arts. 1-13), with amendments in bold; Law 155/2005, "TESTO
COORDINATO DEL DECRETO-LEGGE 27 July 2005, n.144", coordinated
with the conversion law dated 31 luglio 2005, n. 155: "Misure
urgenti per il contrasto del terrorismo internazionale".
(GU n. 177 del 1-8-2005), available at: http://www.cittadinolex.kataweb.it/article_view.jsp?idArt=29664&idCat=54
Other sources
ANSA, 6.8.2005; Il Gazzettino, 8.8.2005; Repubblica, 8.8.2005; Amnesty International press release, AI Index: EUR 30/011/2005, 4.8.2005, "Italy: New "counter-terrorist" legislation jeopardizes exercise of human rights".
16 August 2005
Spotted an error? If you've spotted a problem with this page, just click once to let us know.
Statewatch does not have a corporate view, nor does it seek to create one, the views expressed are those of the author. Statewatch is not responsible for the content of external websites and inclusion of a link does not constitute an endorsement. Registered UK charity number: 1154784. Registered UK company number: 08480724. Registered company name: The Libertarian Research & Education Trust. Registered office: MayDay Rooms, 88 Fleet Street, London EC4Y 1DH. © Statewatch ISSN 1756-851X. Personal usage as private individuals "fair dealing" is allowed. We also welcome links to material on our site. Usage by those working for organisations is allowed only if the organisation holds an appropriate licence from the relevant reprographic rights organisation (eg: Copyright Licensing Agency in the UK) with such usage being subject to the terms and conditions of that licence and to local copyright law.