28 March 2012
Support our work: become a Friend of Statewatch from as little as £1/€1 per month.
CANADA/US/FATF/UK/EU
Charities
and NGOs targeted in "war on terror"
Carters [link] a Canadian law
firm, has published an excellent report examining the impact
of anti-terrorism initiatives in the United States and international
organisations on charities and non-profit organisations (see
Report (pdf)). In 2002, the
US issued "Anti-Terrorism Financing Guidelines: Voluntary
Best Practices for U.S. Based Charities", calling for new
"due diligence" practices including the checking of
all staff against the US, UN and EU terrorist lists (see US
Guidelines
(pdf)). It also recommends that organisations certify that they
will not "employ or deal with" anyone on these lists.
With the stated aim of "globaliz[ing] steps that have already been taken in the United States", the US administration is now attempting to get international organisations to adopt its standards and recommendations (this is what is known as "policy-laundering"). The first port-of-call for the US was the Financial Action Task Force, FATF [link], a multilateral policy-making organisation with 31 member countries that has extended its mandate from money-laundering to terrorist financing. In 2002, the FATF published "International Best Practices for Combating the Abuse of Non-Profit Organizations" (see FATF Guidelines (pdf)).
Targeting charities and NGOs
The thesis promoted by the US is that terrorist organisations use laundered money for their activities and that charities are a potential conduit for terrorist organisations. The US "National Money laundering Strategy" of 2003 thus proposes increased surveillance of domestic charities by various law enforcement and security agencies as well as the close monitoring of charities based in other countries, especially in "conflict zones". One of the 'Six Key Objectives' of the Strategy is "establishing and promoting international standards to be adopted by countries" and "ensuring that countries throughout the world consistently implement these international standards" (see US Strategy (pdf)).
Carters links these new objectives to the US administration's hostility toward NGOs that are critical of US foreign policy. Its singles out "NGOwatch", an initiative launched in early 2004 by the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy (AEI) and the Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies, "two of the most influential and well-funded think tanks serving the current American administration". To mark the launch of www.ngowatch.org [link], the AEI held a conference entitled “NGOs: The Growing Power of an Unelected Few.” A central focus of these initiatives was:
“to expose funding, operations and agendas of international NGO’s and particularly their alleged efforts to constrain U.S. freedom of action in international affairs and influence the behaviour of corporations abroad.”
Criminalising solidarity
On 3 January 2005 The Guardian newspaper reported that two British organisations set up to help the Palestinian people have had their bank accounts abruptly closed without explanation. Both groups claim that their targeting is political. The Palestine Solidarity Campaign, a long established group, had its account closed by the Alliance & Leicester Bank in July 2004. Zoe Mars, the treasurer for the PSC, said that at the end of 2003 the group sent £750 to a medical charity in Palestine. Five months later it got a letter from its bank saying the transaction had been interrupted by the US treasury, which wanted more information on the transfer. The money eventually went through, but raises important questions about the surveillance of financial transactions by the US government and whether there is an appropriate legal basis for its actions (see Guardian report).
The UK Charities Commission has issued a statement and operational guidance on "Charities and Terrorism", both of which are concerned solely with the investigation of alleged links between charities and terrorist organisations. There is no guidance for organisations who maybe unfairly or unjustly targeted or sanctioned.
Criminalising communities
It is not only charities and NGOs that are being caught-up in the dragnet of the "war on terror". The German authorities' response to "September 11" was to begin collecting of data on young men with Islamic background from universities, registration offices, health insurance companies and Germany's "Central Foreigners Register" by German police units after 'September 11' (see "Police "trawling" for suspect foreigners", Statewatch bulletin, vol 12 no 1 (Jan-Feb 2002).
This practice is now apparently being pursued at the EU level with proposals on "radicalism and recruitment" suggesting the targeting of places of worship and education for Arab and Muslim communities. Though there are various references to this initiative the documents have so far been kept secret by the EU institutions.
[more - Tony?]
Spotted an error? If you've spotted a problem with this page, just click once to let us know.
Statewatch does not have a corporate view, nor does it seek to create one, the views expressed are those of the author. Statewatch is not responsible for the content of external websites and inclusion of a link does not constitute an endorsement. Registered UK charity number: 1154784. Registered UK company number: 08480724. Registered company name: The Libertarian Research & Education Trust. Registered office: MayDay Rooms, 88 Fleet Street, London EC4Y 1DH. © Statewatch ISSN 1756-851X. Personal usage as private individuals "fair dealing" is allowed. We also welcome links to material on our site. Usage by those working for organisations is allowed only if the organisation holds an appropriate licence from the relevant reprographic rights organisation (eg: Copyright Licensing Agency in the UK) with such usage being subject to the terms and conditions of that licence and to local copyright law.