- Home /
- News /
- 2012 /
- April /
- EU: REGULATION ON PUBLIC ACCESS TO DOCUMENTS: Council seeks to re-write the definition of a "document" after 19 years
EU: REGULATION ON PUBLIC ACCESS TO DOCUMENTS: Council seeks to re-write the definition of a "document" after 19 years
01 April 2012
See:
Recast of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (first reading) - Preparation of informal trilogues (pdf).
Since 1993 the definition of a "document" has been that a "document shall mean any content whatever its medium" and this is in the current Regulation.
However, the Council intends to keep this general definition (Article 3) but to add Article 3a: "Documents subject to this Regulation": which says a document becomes subject to this Regulation (ie: the whole Regulation) when: "it has been drawn up by an institution and either
formally transmitted to one or more recipients, submitted for filing or registration, approved by the competent official,
or otherwise completed for the purposes for which it was intended" (emphasis added).
In simple terms a "document" is only really a "document" when it is finalised (all the drafts and discussion prior to this are not "documents") - this is the same definition, which was widely criticised, first put forward by the Commission in 2008.
The double-faced language of the Council position means also that while it appears in Article 12 that documents concerning legislative and non-legislative acts: "shall, subject to Articles 4 and 9, be made directly accessible to the public" they are still subject to the general rule in Article 3a above. It would thus negate Articles 15.1 and 15.3 para 5 of the Lisbon Treaty.
Tony Bunyan, Statewatch Director, comments:
"
In 1997 the Amsterdam Treaty promised to "enshrine" the public's right of access to EU documents but in 2001 we only got half the cake. If the Council and the Commission get their way we will be left with just a few crumbs [small fragments]. Access to documents is the life-blood of a healthy, vibrant, democracy which encourages informed consent and dissent. Instead the Council wants an unaccountable democracy bereft of content and meaning."