28 March 2012
Support our work: become a Friend of Statewatch from as little as £1/€1 per month.
France
Human Rights
Watch denounces France's involvement in Syrian regime's military
equipment
19.06.2012
Human Rights Watch (HRW)
has accused France of trying to "have it both ways"
by calling for UN action in Syria while at the same time concluding
profitable trade agreements with a Russian arms company allegedly
exporting military equipment to the Syrian regime. These allegations
come a few days after the European Parliament adopted a resolution
on negotiations on the UN Arms Trade Treaty, calling for legally
binding obligations of transparency and accountability with respect
to "state-to-state transfers, state-to-private end-user
transfers, commercial sales and leases, as well as loans, gifts,
aid or any other form of transfer." [1]
In a statement issued on 3 June, Human Rights Watch urged the
international community to halt contracts "with any company
that may be an accomplice to crimes against humanity," and
in particular with the Russian arms company Rosoboronexport which
"is widely reported to be Syria's main weapons supplier."
[2]
This statement preceded the exposure by Human Rights Watch of
a deal made at the Eurosatory international arms fair in France
between Thales and Rosoboronexport to equip future exported Russian
tanks with thermic surveillance cameras. [3]
Human Rights Watch argues that Thales may have to account for
crimes against humanity with respect to the current conflict
in Syria, and that the French government, which owns about 27%
of the company's shares, is in part responsible for atrocities
committed by Bashar al Assad's regime. Speaking to French magazine
Le Nouvel Observateur, Thales refuted HRW's allegations:
"Pursuant to the terms of the contract [with Rosobonexport]
and French legislation, no re-exportation will be possible without
prior approval by the French authorities." [4]
France's management of its economic interests and its relations
with dictatorships around the world have been denounced by human
rights organisations as being in contradiction with its otherwise
strong stance in favour of UN intervention against some of these
regimes. This was emphasised particularly in the aftermath of
the UN/NATO intervention in Libya based on a UN Resolution [5]
proposed by France, the UK and Lebanon in March 2011. [6]
As former French president Nicolas Sarkozy and UK prime minister
David Cameron were welcomed as liberators during their visit
in Libya shortly after the capture by rebel forces of Tripoli
[7], allegations of collusion between Western regimes and Gaddafi's
dictatorship emerged.
In August 2011, the Wall Street Journal revealed that documents
found at the former Libyan intelligence agency's premises showed
that Western companies, including the French firm Amesys, had
provided Gaddafi's regime with surveillance equipment which,
it is argued, contributed to the oppression of the Libyan population.
[8]
In October 2011, the International Federation for Human Rights
(FIDH) and the French Human Rights League (LDH) lodged a complaint
against the French company Amesys "for crimes allegedly
committed through the supply to Gaddafi's regime, beginning in
2007, of a surveillance system intended to monitor communications
of the Libyan population". [9] A judicial enquiry was eventually
launched in May 2012.
Source
[1] European Parliament resolution of 13 June 2012 on the
negotiations on the UN Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) (2012/2636(RSP))
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA+P7-TA-2012-0251+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN&language=EN
[2] Human Rights Watch, 3 June 2012, Isolate Syria's Arms Suppliers
http://www.hrw.org/news/2012/06/03/isolate-syria-s-arms-suppliers
[3] HRW s'inquiète de la signature d'un contrat entre
Thales et le russe Rosoboronexport, 13 June 2012, Le Monde, http://www.lemonde.fr/economie/article/2012/06/12/hrw-s-inquiete-de-la-signature-d-un-contrat-entre-thales-et-le-russe-rosoboronexport_1717296_3234.html?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
[4] SYRIE: La technologie française au service des chars
d'Assad?, Le Nouvel Observateur, 12 June 2012, http://tempsreel.nouvelobs.com/la-revolte-syrienne/20120612.OBS8299/la-technologie-francaise-au-service-des-chars-d-assad.html
[5] Security Council Approves 'No-Fly Zone' over Libya, Authorizing
'All Necessary Measures' to Protect Civilians, by Vote of 10
in Favour with
5 Abstentions http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2011/sc10200.doc.htm
[6] Libya: UN backs action against Colonel Gaddafi, 18 March
2011, BBC http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-12781009
[7] Cameron and Sarkozy meet Libya's new leaders in Tripoli,
15 September 2011, The Guardian, http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/sep/15/cameron-sarkozy-libya-leader-tripoli?intcmp=239
[8] Firms Aided Libyan Spies, 30 August 2011, Wall Street Journal
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111904199404576538721260166388.html
[9] FIDH, 24 May 2012, Opening of a judicial inquiry targeting
Amesys for complicity in acts of torture in Libya http://www.fidh.org/Opening-of-a-judicial-inquiry
Spotted an error? If you've spotted a problem with this page, just click once to let us know.
Statewatch does not have a corporate view, nor does it seek to create one, the views expressed are those of the author. Statewatch is not responsible for the content of external websites and inclusion of a link does not constitute an endorsement. Registered UK charity number: 1154784. Registered UK company number: 08480724. Registered company name: The Libertarian Research & Education Trust. Registered office: MayDay Rooms, 88 Fleet Street, London EC4Y 1DH. © Statewatch ISSN 1756-851X. Personal usage as private individuals "fair dealing" is allowed. We also welcome links to material on our site. Usage by those working for organisations is allowed only if the organisation holds an appropriate licence from the relevant reprographic rights organisation (eg: Copyright Licensing Agency in the UK) with such usage being subject to the terms and conditions of that licence and to local copyright law.