NETHERLANDS: DATA RETENTION: Dutch DPA opinion about post-ECJ data retention bill: “disproportionate infringement of private life”

Support our work: become a Friend of Statewatch from as little as £1/€1 per month.

"The Dutch DPA notes the government holds on to a general data retention obligation. The Dutch DPA therefore concludes the infringement of the private life of virtually all Dutch citizens is too big and disproportionate.

It furthermore finds that 3 other preconditions have not been met that remain important, even if the data retention obligation were to be restricted. These are:

1. the need to inform people that their data have been accessed after a criminal investigation has been finalised;
2. transparency on the use of retained data, for example through the release of statistics on the number of times data have been accessed;
3. the need to introduce exemptions for those bound by a duty of professional confidentiality."


See the full text: Dutch DPA opinion about post-ECJ data retention bill: “disproportionate infringement of private life” (link)

See also: Dutch DPA says government's data retention plans still illegal - Watchdog wants legislation canned (The Register, link)

Our work is only possible with your support.
Become a Friend of Statewatch from as little as £1/€1 per month.

 

Spotted an error? If you've spotted a problem with this page, just click once to let us know.

Report error