11 November 2016
"Is it plausible that information over a century old could be withheld under FOIA on the grounds of national security and/or endangerment of health and safety? The answer is evidently ‘yes’. That was the outcome of a request for information on informants in the Jack the Ripper investigations... A request for information on police informants involved in Irish secret societies over the period 1890-1910 has met the same outcome."
Support our work: become a Friend of Statewatch from as little as £1/€1 per month.
"Is it plausible that information over a century old could be withheld under FOIA on the grounds of national security and/or endangerment of health and safety? The answer is evidently ‘yes’. That was the outcome of a request for information on informants in the Jack the Ripper investigations (see Marriott v IC EA/2010/0183). A request for information on police informants involved in Irish secret societies over the period 1890-1910 has met the same outcome.
In Judge Wikeley’s recent judgment in Keane v IC, Home Office and Metropolitan Police Service [2016] UKUT 0461 (AAC) (keane-ut), the Upper Tribunal has upheld a First-Tier Tribunal decision that such historical informant-related information should not be disclosed. This was essentially because the recruitment and retention of current informants would be undermined if informants lost confidence that their anonymity would be preserved well after their death.
Judge Wikeley had some reservations about the FTT’s decision, but declined to unpick it via excessively minute textual analysis.
He did, however, offer thoughts on the broad question ‘how long is long enough?’ – for example, it would be a bit of a stretch to withhold equivalent information dating back to the English Civil War."
See: 103-year old files correctly withheld under FOIA (Panopticon, link)
And the judgment on "police informants involved in Irish secret societies in the period 1890-1910": Barry Keane (Appellant) and The Information Commissioner (First Respondent) and others: Appeal against a decision of a tribunal decision of the upper tribunal ([2016] UKUT 0461 (AAC), pdf)
Spotted an error? If you've spotted a problem with this page, just click once to let us know.
Statewatch does not have a corporate view, nor does it seek to create one, the views expressed are those of the author. Statewatch is not responsible for the content of external websites and inclusion of a link does not constitute an endorsement. Registered UK charity number: 1154784. Registered UK company number: 08480724. Registered company name: The Libertarian Research & Education Trust. Registered office: MayDay Rooms, 88 Fleet Street, London EC4Y 1DH. © Statewatch ISSN 1756-851X. Personal usage as private individuals "fair dealing" is allowed. We also welcome links to material on our site. Usage by those working for organisations is allowed only if the organisation holds an appropriate licence from the relevant reprographic rights organisation (eg: Copyright Licensing Agency in the UK) with such usage being subject to the terms and conditions of that licence and to local copyright law.