10 March 2017
Support our work: become a Friend of Statewatch from as little as £1/€1 per month.
EU
Hotspots for refugees in Italy and Greece have led to "serious fundamental rights violations"
10.3.17
Follow us: | | Tweet
The report: Implementation of the 2015 Council Decisions establishing provisional measures in the area of international protection for the benefit of Italy and of Greece(pdf) by Elspeth Guild, Cathryn Costello and Violeta Moreno-Lax
The study, carried out for the European Parliament, examines the main features of the relocation scheme and how it has functioned in practice; the "hotspot approach"; the role of the European Asylum Support Office and other EU agenies with regard to refugees arriving in the EU; and current proposals for the 'Dublin IV' system of responsbility for asylum applications.
On hotspots, the report notes:
"hotspots have not helped in alleviating pressure on the Italian and Greek systems. On the contrary, they increase burdens, because of structural shortcomings in their design and implementation and due to continuing applications, exacerbating the flaws of the Dublin system that the relocation scheme intended to repair.
The study, therefore, recommends a return to the original purpose of the Relocation
Decisions, with the hotspot approach regaining its international protection rationale,
recognising the needs and rights of the forced migrants concerned."
With regard to relocation, it argues that while there are "various practical obstacles... on the ground" in Greece and Italy:
"the main problem is the lack of cooperation from receiving States. The result is that asylum seekers lack information on relocation, and are often left waiting, frustrated, and anxious."
With regard to proposals to include provisions on relocation in the new 'Dublin IV' system, currently under discussions, the report recommends that:
"asylum seekers be fully involved in the relocation process, be provided with ample reliable information on the range of options available to them, and have their preferences taken into account. Family unity must be granted priority (over and above relocation), in line with fundamental rights obligations and also due to its practical potential to facilitate integration in the host community. Asylum-seekers with family members in the EU should not have their claims deemed inadmissible. Legally, the human rights principles of family unity and best interests of the child take priority over any admissibility criteria.
...The engagement of civil society is key in making relocation work properly in this regard; the active participation of asylum seekers is an essential part of making relocation effective and durable; The establishment of a clearing-house system, as many Member States have for young people seeking university places, for asylum seekers relocation; key tenets of the Dublin without coercion model, taking full account of asylum seekers agency and dignity, should be incorporated into any replacements of the Dublin III Regulation and Relocation Decisions."
The report: Implementation of the 2015 Council Decisions establishing provisional measures in the area of international protection for the benefit of Italy and of Greece(pdf) by Elspeth Guild, Cathryn Costello and Violeta Moreno-Lax
Further reading
Search our database for more articles and information or subscribe to our mailing list for regular updates from Statewatch News Online.
Spotted an error? If you've spotted a problem with this page, just click once to let us know.
Statewatch does not have a corporate view, nor does it seek to create one, the views expressed are those of the author. Statewatch is not responsible for the content of external websites and inclusion of a link does not constitute an endorsement. Registered UK charity number: 1154784. Registered UK company number: 08480724. Registered company name: The Libertarian Research & Education Trust. Registered office: MayDay Rooms, 88 Fleet Street, London EC4Y 1DH. © Statewatch ISSN 1756-851X. Personal usage as private individuals "fair dealing" is allowed. We also welcome links to material on our site. Usage by those working for organisations is allowed only if the organisation holds an appropriate licence from the relevant reprographic rights organisation (eg: Copyright Licensing Agency in the UK) with such usage being subject to the terms and conditions of that licence and to local copyright law.