01 July 2018
Support our work: become a Friend of Statewatch from as little as £1/€1 per month.
Statewatch
News Online
UK
ICPO inquiry
into bulk collection of data
6.8.18
Follow us: | | Tweet
Graham Smith: Comments to IPCO on proportionality factors relating to bulk powers (pdf):
"The uses of bulk secondary data illustrated in the Bulk Powers Review make no claim to be limited to ascertaining whether an individual is inside or outside the British Islands. The uses go far wider than that."
Libertys response to the Investigatory Powers Commissioners informal consultation on bulk powers (pdf):
"There is no statutory definition
of bulk. The Bulk Personal Dataset Factsheet that
was released alongside the original Investigatory Powers Bill
described bulk powers as involving the availability of information
about a wide range of people, most of whom are not of interest
to the security and intelligence agencies.
The closest the Investigatory Powers Act (the Act)
comes to defining bulk is contained in Part 7, where BPDs are
defined as a set of information that includes personal
information relating to a number of individuals where the nature
of the set is such that it is likely that the majority of the
individuals are not, and are unlikely to become, of interest
to the intelligence service.
Submission by Open Rights Group to the IPCO request for comments on bulk warrants (pdf):
"Providing some constructive engagement while remaining critical is a difficult line to tread as we are concerned about contributing to the surveillance realism described by academics such as Lina Dencik. Surveillance realism refers to the increasing normalisation of surveillance and its deleterious effects on society, as evidenced in the Cambridge Analytica scandal, which is only the tip of the iceberg. The surveillance activities of the state that IPCO tries to regulate need to be seen in this context."
See also: Report of the Bulk Powers Review by DAVID ANDERSON Q.C. Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation, August 2016 (pdf).
IPCO takes over the responsibility for oversight of investigatory powers from the Interception of Communications Commissioners Office (IOCCO), the Office of Surveillance Commissioners (OSC) and the Intelligence Services Commissioner (ISComm) in September 2017. IPCO immediately takes over the inspection and audit functions of these bodies and the prior approval function of Surveillance Commissioners relating to intrusive surveillance, property interference and undercover officers by law enforcement.
Backgound: Home Office: annual report on use of "disruptive and investigatory powers" by security, intelligence and law enforcement agencies (Statewatch News)
Search our database for more articles and information or subscribe to our mailing list for regular updates from Statewatch News Online.
Spotted an error? If you've spotted a problem with this page, just click once to let us know.
Statewatch does not have a corporate view, nor does it seek to create one, the views expressed are those of the author. Statewatch is not responsible for the content of external websites and inclusion of a link does not constitute an endorsement. Registered UK charity number: 1154784. Registered UK company number: 08480724. Registered company name: The Libertarian Research & Education Trust. Registered office: MayDay Rooms, 88 Fleet Street, London EC4Y 1DH. © Statewatch ISSN 1756-851X. Personal usage as private individuals "fair dealing" is allowed. We also welcome links to material on our site. Usage by those working for organisations is allowed only if the organisation holds an appropriate licence from the relevant reprographic rights organisation (eg: Copyright Licensing Agency in the UK) with such usage being subject to the terms and conditions of that licence and to local copyright law.