07 June 2023
The Council is hoping to approve its negotiating positions on the Asylum and Migration Management Regulation (AMMR), Asylum Procedure Regulation (APR) and Single Permit Directive on legal migration at the Justice and Home Affairs Council meeting tomorrow. The texts, published here, were circulated in the Council yesterday (AMMR and APR) and at the end of May (Single Permit Directive).
Support our work: become a Friend of Statewatch from as little as £1/€1 per month.
Image: EU Council Eurozone, CC BY-NC-ND 2.0
Asylum and Migration Management Regulation (AMMR)
A proposed general approach of the AMMR (pdf) was circulated amongst national delegations in the Council yesterday. It has come a long way from the Commission's original proposal and contains a host of new provisions, requirements, options, opt-outs and unaccountable decision-making structures.
The general approach follows a compilation of member state comments (pdf) circulated on 22 May and a revised compromise text (pdf) on 26 May. These came after a "policy debate" in COREPER on 17 May and follow similar documents that were published by Statewatch two weeks ago.
Asylum Procedure Regulation (APR)
A proposed general approach of the APR (pdf) was also circulated yesterday. Like the AMMR, it is long and complex.
As Catherine Woolard of the European Council on Refugees and Exiles said to Politico Europe, the architecture created by the new set of rules is "byzantine":
"This has become this sort of absurdist unworkable, absurdist construction,” Woolard said. “You have the rules, and then you have exemptions to the rules, and then you have offsets to the responsibilities."
A previous compromise text of the APR (pdf) was put together after the COREPER debate on 17 May and circulated to delegations on 26 May.
A note (pdf) circulated by the Swedish Presidency on 26 May highlights the key points of the AMMR and APR as they stood at the time.
Single Permit Directive
The Council's general approach (pdf) is due to be approved tomorrow by the JHA Council, but not everyone is happy - in a statement (pdf), the Hungarian delegation says:
"We are opposed to efforts to encourage the mobility of workers within Member States, which poses a serious challenge to the countries of our region. The recast of the Directive would further restrict the space for manoeuvre, particularly with regard to the possibility of changing status and allowing periods of unemployment.
National competences should be retained to ensure that decisions can respond flexibly to labour market needs and changes in these, taking into account the different economic, geographic, cultural and social conditions. We consider it essential to leave Member States the freedom to decide who can enter their territory to work, under what conditions and admission procedure. Therefore, we would like to stress our strong position according to which Hungary does not consider either necessary or appropriate the further harmonisation in the field of legal migration, and in this regard we would like to reiterate our position on legal migration in general.
We acknowledge that the reached compromise is the result of proper negotiations, however, for the reasons mentioned above Hungary abstains from adopting the general approach."
Documentation
Council documents detailing the state of play with the Asylum Procedure Regulation (including comments from the member states), the Asylum and Migration Management Regulation, and a Presidency discussion paper on the "balance between solidarity and responsibility".
The Council of the EU wants to simplify the detention of families and children for the purposes of processing asylum applications at the borders.
Discussions are ongoing on the Pact, with member states debating how to deal with the European Parliament's position on Eurodac and discussions ongoing within the Council on the Asylum and Migration Management Regulation. Documents published here provide an insight into the issues under discussion.
Spotted an error? If you've spotted a problem with this page, just click once to let us know.
Statewatch does not have a corporate view, nor does it seek to create one, the views expressed are those of the author. Statewatch is not responsible for the content of external websites and inclusion of a link does not constitute an endorsement. Registered UK charity number: 1154784. Registered UK company number: 08480724. Registered company name: The Libertarian Research & Education Trust. Registered office: MayDay Rooms, 88 Fleet Street, London EC4Y 1DH. © Statewatch ISSN 1756-851X. Personal usage as private individuals "fair dealing" is allowed. We also welcome links to material on our site. Usage by those working for organisations is allowed only if the organisation holds an appropriate licence from the relevant reprographic rights organisation (eg: Copyright Licensing Agency in the UK) with such usage being subject to the terms and conditions of that licence and to local copyright law.